meta.am obviously algorythmic |
james patterson iterative assembly tool |
joshua davis art-making machines |
amit pitaru iterative sound tool |
danny brown mathematics is the language of nature |
ed burton sodaplay: gravity and behaviour |
marius watz organic drawing machine, universal digest |
camille utterback visualize our movement |
golan levin visualize our breath, iterate a font, map gesture and object to sound |
ben fry nature shows us how to visualize data |
archs-os awareness design, display information in new ways |
john klima ecosystm portrays shows currency volatility through behaviour of creatures |
carnivore display network traffic through physical clients |
knitting map weather and traffic in cork is recorded through knitting stitches and colors |
| obviously algorythmic | tool as art | emulate nature's rules | display our world | ||||||||||
|
we've mutated from using digital media to emulate nature - displaying and subverting its forces and rules in the digital realm - to using nature and the physical world to display what goes on in our ether/ networked world.
nb: This list is by no means exhaustive. It gives a sample from several key points in recent iterative art. We could take this to Sol Lewitt, to John Cage, to anything related to rules-based art, but we've been there, so I'm gonna stick to stuff we haven't covered, or stuff we've covered less.
|
questions: (use CardStacks) - an example
How is the code visualized in these pieces (perception vs. construction)? What roles do aesthetics and utility play in these formulations? Where do these pieces fall in the spectrum between formalist and culturalist approaches? What distinguishes data visualization software from art that displays dynamic data? |
||||||||||||